There is often a discussion relative to the benefits of different types of training, and usually the “types of training” compared are slower/longer training sessions (Quantity) versus shorter/faster training sessions (Quality). However, both slower/longer workouts and shorter/faster workouts can be considered “Quality” relative to the benefits they produce in a runner’s body. Therefore, “Quantity” can also be considered as “Quality.”
What is the biggest misconception when it comes to running biomechanics? We asked Run SMART coach Nikki Reiter, who is a Master of Human Kinetics. She had a very short answer, “Read this: Myths of Running: Forefoot, Barefoot and Otherwise.”
We also emailed our head coach Dr. Jack Daniels, who certainly knows a thing or two about the subject as well. Here’s what the doctor had to say:
Linking current research to running
By Nikki Reiter
Every once and a while, a wonderful little thing happens. A researcher decides to do a systematic review of a topic and then presents their findings in a paper. I get a little excited when the topic pertains to running.
Recently, a team of researchers reviewed how footwear could affect running performance and economy. Since running economy (RE) is a commonly accepted way to discuss distance running performance, it would be great to know the general consensus amongst publications about the effect of footwear selection on running performance and RE.
Image by Huei-Ming Chai, National Taiwan University School of Physical Therapy
Linking current research to running
By Nikki Reiter
It is believed that at the highest level of running performance, running economy is the most crucial factor dictating performance. So, who better than a homogenous sample of some of the best distance runners in the world to challenge this idea? An international team of researchers published an article in the January issue of Journal of Sports Sciences, investigating the relationship between running economy and running performance in elite Kenyan distance runners. [PubMed abstract]
