Run S.M.A.R.T.
Menu
Login
  • Custom Training Plans
  • Private Coaching
  • Dr. Jack Daniels
  • Running Calculator
  • Coaching Staff
  • News & Updates
  • Contact Us
Featured Video Play Icon

Part 2, Race Kick: Strength Or Speed?

July 13, 2015 By Run S.M.A.R.T. In Training tips /  6

By Malindi Elmore

[Part 1 of “It’s All About The Kick” can be found here.]

Many track runners think they must possess raw speed to win with a kick. This is simply not true. Kicking is often a relative term, and can almost be explained better as who slows down the least. The faster the pace, the more likely this is true. Pedestrian or championship “sit and kick” races are their own category and stranger things have been known to happen, so for the sake of this argument, let’s assume that the majority of the race is at a pace appropriate for the quality of the field assembled. (In Part 3  of this series I’ll discuss “Shifting Gears” for championship race kicks).

Let’s pretend the field is running a 4-minute 1500m pace (64 seconds/ lap) – which is world class running for women. Let’s also pretend we have 2 favored athletes in the race: Runner A who is a 1:57 800m runner and Runner B who is a 14:40 5000m runner. Runner A can obviously run much faster over 200m than Runner B (probably around 5-6 seconds faster in a 200m sprint!). If the race pace is fast and the both athletes are still together with 200m to go, who do you think will win the race?

If the first 1300m of the race is an honest pace, I would be inclined to say that Runner B (the 5000m runner) has an equal or better chance of winning the race. Why? Because simply running 30 seconds at the end of the race will be a “kick.” The athlete that arrives to the start of the kick the least tired will have a better chance of being able to change gears and run the same pace or faster to the finish.

The same is true for many 800m races:  if you time the last 200m of the race, it is often slower than the first 200m of the race, and although it appears that the winning athlete “kicked” to win, he was actually just slowing down the least. This is why it is so dramatic when runners (like Nick Symmonds) can run from the back of the field and fly down the finishing straight to win the race. The other athletes are simply slowing down and he is running the same speed or maybe a bit faster than he was earlier in the race but appears to be sprinting. In the video above he runs roughly :54 seconds for his first 400m and comes back in :54 to win in 1:48.

I use these analogies for two primary reasons:

  1. To encourage you to watch races and actually pay attention to the splits of top athletes.
  2. To assure you that you do not need the fastest foot speed in the field to win races. What you need is to be fit, strong, aerobically developed, patient, confident, and savvy in your races – and consider that if you are part of the race with 200m remaining, you can win with the right timing of your kick.

–

Malindi Elmore is a Run SMART Project private coach. As an athlete she competed in the 2004 Olympic Games in the 1500m. She’s a 6-time National Champion and Stanford record-holder in the 800m and 1500m. To customize her 1500/mile training plan go here. To work with Malindi privately sign up here.

Tags:
1500m800MMalindi Elmorerace kick
Dr. Jack Daniels' Sample Treadmill Hill Workout
Get Your Temperature Adjustment

Archives

  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007

Meta

  • Log in
All rights reserved.