Run S.M.A.R.T.
Menu
Login
  • Custom Training Plans
  • Private Coaching
  • Dr. Jack Daniels
  • Running Calculator
  • Coaching Staff
  • News & Updates
  • Contact Us

Should The Boston Marathon Course Be Legal?

April 11, 2012 By Run S.M.A.R.T. In Uncategorized /  

NYRR hosted a good debate about whether the Boston Marathon course should be legal for world-record purposes. As it stands the course is not legal because it’s point-to-point and its net elevation loss exceeds the IAAF’s limits. We asked some of our coaches to weigh in and it looks like they all agree with the current rule. Jack thinks without last year’s extreme tailwind, times would have been up to 5 minutes slower.

Jack Daniels:  Some years ago I calculated the benefit of the overall downhills of Boston and it was published in Runners World. I went as far as to calculate the time loss during various uphill segments and the gain of various downhill segments. I have a copy of that publication somewhere and will try to find it. Obviously when you see a picture of someone with long hair running Boston and their hair is being blown out in front of their face, they have a pretty good tailwind. I actually have data on the benefits of tailwinds of different velocities and headwinds of various velocities and no question headwinds hurt more than tailwinds help. Something I have always felt might be a good question to ask is what time do you think they would have run last year on Boston if the course had been run in the reverse direction — any guesses here? I would certainly think more than 5 minutes slower.

Mike Smith:  I feel very strongly about this because I am a big fan of this sport and want to hold it to sound standards. The downhill isn’t my problem. It’s the point to point. Amby nailed it when he said “every 20 years”, that’s it: plenty of years you’ll have a cross wind, a head wind even, or no wind. But in April, 2011 you had 25-30 mpw SW winds on a point to point and the rest is history. And that isn’t even mentioning net elevation drop. Anyone who says “they still had to cover the distance” better be prepared to stand by any argument of what that means. You’re saying all that matters is you cover the distance, it doesn’t matter how. With aid of any kind it immediately negates time.

Thus I believe Boston is the greatest marathon on earth, with the richest history, with the most incredible crowds, it’s home to my Mass. Heroes Rodgers and Salazar, it’s home to some legendary battles. But it is not eligible for records. People want to so badly to say “I’ve run Boston and that shit is TOUGH!” because it certainly doesn’t feel aided. Any marathon is tough, especially throw in some decent hills from 16-18 miles. BUT, what we’re talking about is protecting the standards from which we derive records and all time lists. And those standards should be rock solid.

Alicia Shay:  If there is a net downhill and the possibility for the majority of the race to be wind aided, it shouldn’t qualify for record. Anyone who lives in Flagstaff through the spring knows what a good tailwind can do for a workout! It’s crazy, you feel like your are floating even with 15-20 mph so I would imagine that you could maintain a lower percentage of VO2 max throughout the race, have less oxygen requirements and hold a faster pace at a lower level of effort.

Ann Alyanak:  Boston is a challenging course and I don’t think the net drop in elevation is really that big of a benefit due to the other uphills. I don’t think it should be legal for record setting purposes though because it is point to point. I agree with Mike’s statements. If you have a tailwind for the majority of the race, it is going to be a huge advantage and we did see this last year.  Boston is an amazing marathon but due to the nature of the course it should not be eligible for records.

Where do you stand?

Tags:
Alicia ShayAnn AlyanakBoston MarathonDr. Jack DanielsMike SmithNYRR
Boston Marathon Racing Tips
Ed Balow Drops 15 Minutes Off Half Marathon Time

Archives

  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007

Meta

  • Log in
All rights reserved.